Article # 18
Based on the interview with Barbara-Lynn Taylor, M.Ed. On
“Raising Your Kids”
Aired on WXII-12
Wednesday, June 9, 2004
DISCIPLINE
IS TEACHING: LOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
from
“Discipline Makes the Difference”, Part Three
of the video-based parenting program, Successful
Parenting
Discipline is teaching. It’s teaching our children to
be socially responsible and to demonstrate self-discipline.
The previous article described the use of natural consequences
to teach lessons. Sometimes there is no obvious natural consequence
or the natural consequence might be too costly or dangerous
for a parent to allow it to happen. In those cases, another
choice parents have when disciplining their children (teaching
the lessons they need to learn) is to use logical consequences.
These are similar to natural consequences in that they show
a child the result of his or her actions. However, they are
not just what “Mother Nature” might indicate,
they are what happens when parents decide on a certain action
that fits what children did that was wrong so that they will
learn not to do that again. The key is that logical consequences
are based on facts, clear rational thought, and sensible reasoning.
Using this technique is a bit more difficult than using natural
consequences because parents have to come up with a course
of action that makes sense and on which they’re willing
to follow through.
For example, let’s say your ten-year-old boy has been
told not to play with a baseball inside his grandmother’s
house. But, he does it anyway and breaks her flower vase.
There might be several possible logical consequences:
1. He could clean up the mess and apologize to his grandmother.
2. He could glue the vase back together.
3. He could use his own money to replace the vase if a replacement
can be found. If he doesn’t have any money, he could
do chores for the family or in the neighborhood until he has
earned enough money to replace it. It is best if the child
can actually go to the store to purchase the new vase and
then present it himself to his grandmother.
Each
of these possibilities is logical. Each makes sense. The “crime”
fits the “punishment”, so to speak. Because of
that, the lesson will be remembered. There is a clear connection
like a stimulus and a response.
The
alternatives of preaching, yelling, ridiculing, shaming, and
blaming do not have the same learning effect because of two
reasons:
1. Our children have heard us do all of those so many times
before that they just tune us out.
2. There is no connection between the mistake they made and
what happened to them, so when they begin to do that wrong
action the next time, it does not trigger the lesson that
we tried to teach.
One
problem parents of teens often face is that the teens come
in past curfew. Logical consequences are a perfect strategy
to use to teach the lesson that it is important to come in
on time. There are several options. Let’s say your teenage
daughter comes in thirty minutes late after going out with
her school friends to a party at a neighbor’s house.
There are several ways you could apply logical consequences:
1. She could be required to come in the same thirty minutes
earlier the next time she goes out.
2. She could be restricted from going out with that same group
of school friends for some period of time.
3. She could be restricted from going to the home of the teen
that gave the party for some period of time.
4. She could be confined to your home or property for some
period of time. This is usually referred to as “grounding”.
The privileges she retains depend on the parents’ preferences.
Some parents still allow guests to come into the home and
some do not. Some still allow phone, e-m, or i-m privileges
while others shut the child off completely for the period
of the grounding. Some curtail the watching of television
and some do not. Setting each of these parameters is up to
the individual family.
Any
of these would be connected to the fact that she came in late
after being out with her friends and would therefore be a
strong way to teach the lesson that if she goes out with friends,
she has to be home on time. Again, it is far more effective
than just yelling, preaching or selecting random consequences
that have nothing to do with what she did.
There
are three mistakes parents often make in the use of logical
consequences:
1. The consequence they use is not really connected to the
behavior such as, “You ate the cake we were having for
dessert, so go to your room.” What does one have to
do with the other? Baking a new cake or providing a new dessert
and missing one’s own dessert would be a more logical
consequence.
2. They make the period of time the child is restricted way
too long. Teenagers love being in touch with their friends
even more than breathing, so even couple to a few days usually
has a great impression. Except in rare instances, a week is
plenty. A month is way too long. That only leads to anger
and the lesson is lost in the furor.
3. They fail to supervise the consequence and it becomes meaningless.
It is difficult because it may cause a great imposition o
the parents, but it is important. For instance, if your seventeen
year-old got a speeding ticket and you have decided to deny
your child the use of a car but he must get to school or to
a job, somebody needs to be prepared to give up the time to
take the child or find a way for the child to get there. If
we are going to impose a logical consequence, we had better
be ready to make it stick. We should say what we mean and
mean what we say!
Another
example with a younger child would be if your four-year-old
leaves her toys all over the kitchen floor after you have
asked her to put them away. Some logical consequences would
be:
1. You put the toys in a box, basket, closet, or attic and
give them back one at a time as she shows she’ll put
them away when asked.
2. You make all of them “disappear” by hiding
them for a day or two, and then give them all back with instructions
to be sure to put them away as soon as she is asked or the
toys will again be taken.
3. An extreme method would be for you to give a warning and
then if it happens again, give the toys away to needy children.
Using
logical consequences does require some creativity and some
time and energy on the part of us parents, but it is worth
it because it effectively teaches our children lessons in
behaving in socially acceptable ways and in becoming mature,
responsible adults.